late 14c., “act of referring to a third party for judgment or decision,” from Old French submission or directly from Latin submissionem (nominative submissio) “a lowering, letting down; sinking,” noun of action from past participle stem of submittere “to let down, put down, lower, reduce, yield” (see submit).Sense of “humble obedience” is first recorded mid-15c. Modern French submission has been replaced by doublet soumission. English in 16c.-17c. also had an adjective submiss “humble, submissive.” Submissionist in various political historical contexts is from 1828.
We’re slaves to learned behavior, and broken idea’s. We use terms and labels extremely loosely without giving those terms and labels any context. A bunch of idea’s floating in the air without any concrete meaning. We have beliefs that need to be challenged. Not for the sake of being rebellious or defiant, but for the sake of knowledge and objectivism.
OK “IZ YOU READY” ????
Silly, backward thinking, mindless, brain-dead women submit ! Yup that’s right, coward-ass brawds submit to dick. It isn’t a smart move at all to give up autonomy for tradition, and customs. Individualism is important! A person needs to define what things mean to them independent of group think. It’s group think that tricks the world into believing the natural role for a woman is to submit just because. This thought process is backed, supported and endorsed by two thousand years of Judeo-Christian gender politics, and that would be Ok I guess as long as those politics raises the intelligence level of the people those politics impact.
Yes women are silly as hell, for submitting, especially since the idea of submission is supposedly supported by GOD, even though the first man GOD ever created (allegedly) was a punk not worthy of submission. You know what, FUCK IT….
GENEISIS ( 2:16-17 )
16. “AND THE LORD GOD COMMANDED THE MAN, SAYING OF EVERY TREE
OF THE GARDEN YOU MAY FREELY EAT;”
17. “BUT OF THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL,
YOU SHALL NOT EAT, FOR IN THE DAY THAT YOU EAT OF IT, YOU SHALL
Majority of Americans believe in the bible, and they create how they want their life to look based on the information inside the bible. The story of Adam and Eve is an incredible story, but it’s not wise to create a society based on the story because the story doesn’t make any sense.
Let’s take a deeper look
1. Adam is supposedly the first man who ever existed. All of our habits come from Adam, so everything that existed in him exist in us, right?
2. Adam has direct contact with GOD, they have a personal relationship. Adam has a natural connection with GOD, right? Adam’s natural behavior should be our natural behavior right?.
3. Adam was COMMANDED, not to eat of the tree of knowledge. This was a direct commandment from “GOD”, no third-party.
GENEISIS ( 3:9-13 )
9. “THEN THE LORD GOD CALLED TO ADAM AND SAID TO HIM, WHERE ARE
10. So he said “I HEARD YOUR VOICE IN THE GARDEN AND I WAS AFRAID
BECAUSE I WAS NAKED AND I HID MYSELF”
11. And He Said “ WHO TOLD YOU THAT YOU WERE NAKED? HAVE YOU
EATEN FROM THE TREE OF WHICH I COMMANDED YOU THAT YOU SHOULD
12. Then the man said “ THE WOMAN WHOM YOU GAVE TO BE WITH ME,
SHE GAVE ME OF THE TREE AND I ATE”
Read those verses out loud! See any problems? Do you see where the first man ever created, is placing blame on his women? He is placing blame on her, even though HE was the one commanded by “GOD” not to eat of the tree of knowledge. It never says, Adam told EVE not to of the tree, so there’s a huge problem here.
• PROBLEM A. There is a misconception that a male is a natural leader, and that’s false because Adam was supposedly the first man who ever existed and leadership wasn’t natural to him. A male can never graduate to leadership without accountability. Does this sound like accountability to you? “ THEN THE MAN SAID………..THE WOMAN WHOM YOU GAVE TO BE WITH ME, SHE GAVE ME OF THE TREE AND I ATE”
• PROBLEM B. Adam isn’t a teacher either. Isn’t he the first man? Isn’t EVE new to the planet? Who’s job is it to educate her about the environment their in? Adam takes direct commandments from GOD, who does EVE take guidance from? Adam? No! Because he never taught her, instead she was taught by the serpent.
13. The woman said “ THE SERPENT DECIEVED ME, AND I ATE”
This is important because they’re believed to be the first human beings on earth, but they have no foundation with each other. The man isn’t a leader, or a teacher, and he disobeys his GOD, and the first women created wasn’t taught anything by the first man created, however something/someone did teach her, “ THE SERPENT”.
1. Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “ HAS GOD INDEED SAID, YOU SHALL NOT EAT OF EVERY TREE OF THE GARDEN”??
2. And the woman said to the serpent, “WE MAY EAT THE FRUIT OF THE TREES OF THE GARDEN;
3. “But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, YOU SHALL NOT EAT IT, NOR SHALL YOU TOUCH IT, LEST YOU DIE”
4. Then the serpent said to the woman, “YOU WILL NOT SURELY” die.
5. “For GOD knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing GOOD and evil.
Now, I’m using these scriptures from the bible to lay the foundation of my point, because this is where people get their behavior from.
WHY WOULD A WOMAN SUBMIT??
If eve is the first woman, shouldn’t she be the example for every woman on the planet? Eve wasn’t born naturally submissive though, in fact she was extremely rebellious and independent. Eve’s original nature wasn’t submissiveness, and I have proof.
GENEISIS ( 3:16 )
16. TO THE WOMAN HE SAID (God)
“I WILL GREATLY MULTIPLY YOUR SORROW AND YOUR CONCEPTION;
IN PAIN YOU SHALL BRING FORTH CHILDREN;
YOUR DESIRE SHALL BE FOR YOUR HUSBAND,
AND HE SHALL RULE OVER YOU”
Still don’t see the issue here? Well let me break it down for you! I’m going to break it down to the point no one can put it back together.
1. SUBMISSION IS A CURSE: The man didn’t rule over the woman until an event happened. Submission isn’t natural to the female species. If Eve was naturally submissive she wouldn’t have listened to the serpent over her hubby.
2. THE WOMAN WANTED WISDOM: The serpent told Eve that the tree of knowledge would make her wise. Adam had no desire to eat from that tree because he had no desire to be wise.
3. THE WOMAN SHOWED LEADERSHIP: Adam ate the fruit because Eve suggested it. If Adam was a great leader, there was no way he would have been compromised so easily.
4. THE MALE SPECIES ISN’T THE WOMAN’S NATURAL TEACHER: The only time Eve is talking, is when she is having a conversation with the Serpent. The serpent taught eve, not Adam.
The only reason women have submitted to males for the past two thousand years is because the 1% need poor men not to revolt. Poor men will accept crumbs, as long as they have the opportunity to have a wife of their own. As long as lower class men have the ability to have a woman of their own, they won’t over throw men at the top. Poor men aren’t killing rich men, simply because poor men have the opportunity to have a woman, but if that opportunity stops, society will fall into chaos!!!
Silly women submit because their lazy! Silly women submit because their cowards. Silly women submit because their scared however there are benefits for women to be submissive. Submissiveness can be a strategic tool women use to scale out of low-income environments. If a rich man marries, and impregnates a poor woman, her being submissive to a rich man changes her life tremendously. On the flip side, I can’t honestly be mad at people playing the hand they were dealt. Life is brutal when you’re born in a position to fail.
**THE GAME 2.0**
The problem with the concept of submission is, there’s no context to it. There’s no manual to qualify special attributes that a male needs to have outside of a penis for women to put themselves in that position. Most of the time money, power and status are the qualifiers for women to give up their autonomy but there’s a huge flaw in that. How did the man attain his money, power and status? It matters because if women choose to submit, they should submit to the most mentally dominate man. If the man got his money, power, and status from using his mind then he has the ability to put women in submission with thought. If a man got his money, power, and status because of inheritance or luck, then the woman is submitting in order to enjoy a certain lifestyle.
***THE GAME 3.0***
The universe is mental! It’s thought that separates MAN and male. The majority of women in the world submit to males, not MEN. They submit to the body of a male, but the women that submit to MEN are submitting to knowledge, wisdom, and understanding. Women have the ability to get food, clothes and shelter on their own so a male providing that is great but it isn’t unique, however a man teaching a woman and showing her how to look at the world is. Few men have the ability to dominate a woman mentality but the few that can, put women into submission without money, without cars or promises of gifts because HE is the gift.
A lot of females are lazy at their core and they need someone to think for them, so they opt into being submissive. A lot of guys are corny, but they got lucky in the game, now they have the trinkets women want and it means a lot because the average female has done and seen so little. If a woman gives up her natural born autonomy, she should do it for the man with the strongest mind. His mind will elevate her out of her animal state into something higher, and she’ll become an alpha among females, not because of anything physical…no! It will be because she’s able to dominate their minds.
If women submit to males because of material possessions, what happens when another man with more comes around, does she submit to him as well and leave her hunny? Knowledge, wisdom, and understanding are the only things women should submit too, never to a body part.
GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT FROM KEN BRISBON
MEMBERS ONLY http://www.kenbillions.com